Record Detail Back

XML

Exploring critical realism as the theoretical foundation of mixed-method research: evidence from the economics of IS innovations


Despite the call for pluralism in IS research there is a lack of multi-method research published in
information systems journals. While many researchers might find the idea of using multiple methods
attractive, there are barriers that prevent them from employing this approach in practice. In this paper
we try to address key philosophical concerns that often deter more extensive use of multiple methods,
encourage openness to innovative methodological choices, and deepen practical understanding about
how critical realism can be used as the foundation of IS research designs. We begin by exploring the
value of critical realism as a theoretical foundation for mixed-method information systems research.
After discussing the debate surrounding quantitative methods (especially economics) among critical
realists, we propose making the identification of demi-regularities pivotal to the design of qualitative
fieldwork. To provide support for this approach we present evidence from a study of IS innovation
adoption in financial services which we believe highlights the value of multiple methods to inspire and
inform the research process as it unfolds.
Zachariadis, M. - Personal Name
Scott, S. - Personal Name
Barrett, M. - Personal Name
NONE
Exploring critical realism as the theoretical foundation of mixed-method research: evidence from the economics of IS innovations
Research Method
English
2010
LOADING LIST...
LOADING LIST...