Record Detail Back

XML

Hidden Financial Risk Understanding Off–Balance Sheet Accounting


When I graduated with a doctorate in 1977, I researched and published articles on mainstream
topics, particularly current value accounting and the interaction between earnings
and cash flows. After a while, it occurred to me that these are not the crucial issues
of financial accounting and reporting. Ethics and honesty and fairness to financial statement
users comprise the foundational issues of the profession. If a business enterprise
adopted the best methods for accounting but did so with treachery and duplicity, it
would not help any capital market agent. If I have to choose between the best accounting
methods and managerial integrity, I always prefer the latter.
I started writing articles on such topics in the 1980s and published them in obscure
academic journals. Then in January 1996 I began writing the “Spirit of Accounting” column
for Accounting Today with my friend Paul Miller. I needed a break in 2000, so I
quit the column; Paul Bahnson joined Paul Miller on it. After a year’s respite, I found
myself writing “Accounting Annotations” for Accounting Today and “The Accounting
Cycle: Wash, Rinse, and Spin” for SmartPros.com.
Then Enron disclosed problems in its third-quarter report of 2001 and soon declared
bankruptcy. All of a sudden people were interested in accounting at levels I had never
experienced previously. During the first half of 2002 I had at least 500 interviews with
the media, and I discussed at length issues about Enron, Global Crossing, WorldCom,
Tyco, Adelphia, and Arthur Andersen. My main message was simple: The culture of
financial reporting that began around 1990 brought about this mess. When managers
engage in “earnings management,” what they really mean is that when they cannot
make profits legitimately, they will exaggerate and abuse accounting numbers until the
reported numbers make them look good. Aiding and abetting this process of “earnings
management” have been board directors who never asked serious questions, corporate
lawyers who were eager to push the limits, stock brokers and investment bankers who
did not care how they made a buck, financial analysts who worried little that they served
as used-car salesmen for their investment banking firms, auditors who looked the other
way, an impotent Financial Accounting Standards Board, an overextended Securities
and Exchange Commission, and members of Congress who would tolerate almost anything
for sufficiently large campaign contributions.
J. Edward Ketz - Personal Name
0-471-43376-4
NONE
Accounting
English
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2003
Canada
1-313
LOADING LIST...
LOADING LIST...